False equivalency
Day 36.
Here is something I did a week ago that I’m finding has an afterglow. I’m still drawing strength from this action, which is pretty good, seeing as how I started it from a place of miserable rage.
The rage hit me when I read this article in the New York Times, titled “Political Divide on Campuses Hardens after Trump Victory.” This article went through some revisions after it was initially published, but it still contained the following when it was finished:
Bias incidents on both sides have been reported. A student walking near campus was threatened with being lit on fire because she wore a hijab. Other students were accused of being racist for supporting Mr. Trump, according to a campuswide message from Mark Schlissel, the university’s president.
You see it right? What I saw, and what made me fly into an all-caps-comment-spewing rage, was the false equivalency drawn between someone hearing that they’re racist, and someone’s very life being threatened.
Not the same. Not remotely.
So I wrote this letter, about a week ago now. It took some time. But when I’d finished I felt better. No less motivated, no less angry, but more able to find the problem and call it out.
Here’s what I wrote. (They’re not going to publish it, so I might as well.)
To the Editor:
Your piece on the discomfort of Trump supporters at the University of Michigan compares their struggles to those of a Muslim student who was threatened with immolation if she didn’t remove her hijab. Conservative students there apparently can’t tell the difference between being called a racist and fearing for your life. Can you?
Today I hope you can find some way to sharpen yourself like writing this letter sharpened me. Find a way to point yourself at the problem. Tell the truth. Even if they don’t publish it, or they won’t.
And once you’ve done that? Get ready to keep doing it.
